The Role of Comparative Fault in Indiana Premises Liability Cases

When you have been hurt on someone else’s land, you may be entitled to financial compensation from the reckless property owner.

Unfortunately, due to Indiana’s laws on comparative fault, premises liability cases can be challenging to pursue. The diligent lawyers of Fleschner, Stark, Tanoos & Newlin understand the role of comparative fault in Indiana premises liability cases and are here to serve as your legal advocate. Contact our firm today to learn more about comparative fault and how it could play a role in your case.

Indiana’s comparative fault law means each party’s contribution to an accident will factor into the amount of damages a claimant can recover.

How Does Comparative Fault Impact Premises Liability Cases?

Comparative fault laws in Indiana make it more challenging for injured parties to secure compensation in all kinds of personal injury cases, such as premises liability. Defendants and insurance companies may dispute the injured party’s claim to lessen their liability.

To deny these claims, the plaintiff should have compelling evidence and arguments. A skilled attorney from our firm could help demonstrate that the defendant’s actions were the main contributor to the accident and that the injured party’s actions had little bearing on it.

Understand the Role of Comparative Fault in Indiana Premises Liability Cases Today

After a premises liability incident in Indiana, speaking with an accomplished personal injury attorney is critical. The attorneys of Fleschner, Stark, Tanoos & Newlin could confidently guide you through the legal system and uphold your rights. We strive to give our clients the advantage they deserve by utilizing our comprehensive understanding of modified comparative negligence and state-specific laws. Contact us today to get started.